Liberty is the opposite of tyranny!

Canada has been doing its part to help protect the free world!

I am glad to see Canada has been doing its part to help protect the free world!

Canadian Navy 2010

 

BloggingForLiberty.info

You remember Emperor Nero, he fiddled while Rome burned?

You remember Emperor Nero, he fiddled while Rome burned?
Political Circus: Kerry's a soul man. Clinton lights up the Web. And Biden is...
 
Legend has it that in A.D. 64 the Emperor Nero (who ruled Rome from A.D. 54 – A.D. 68, and last of the Caesars), set fire to Rome to get an idea of how Troy looked when it was in flames and to serve as a suitable background for a recitation of his poetry while playing the fiddle.
It appears he did not actually play the fiddle (perhaps a lyre) or start the big fire in A.D. 64, but he did order some other people’s buildings be burned to the ground to stop the fire’s progress. 
 
In the end, the fire burned for nine days and destroyed two thirds of the city of Rome. Nero blamed the fire on the Christians, who were then a much put-upon sect and a handy scapegoat. Hmmm, it seems like history is repeating.
 
After the fire, he decided he wanted to “change” Rome and in so doing he would become immortalized. He decided to rebuild the once wooden city of Rome with centrally-planned government buildings of marble and stone. He got the land he wanted by confiscating Roman citizens’ property via condemnation proceedings, and he went on a spending spree never before seen in history (well, that is until 2005 when the Democrats took over both Houses of Congress, and then accelerated their spending when one of their own went from fast spending Senator to ludicrous spending President in 2008)… 
 
Several years into Nero’s investment in “infrastructure” the Roman government went broke; so what did Nero do? He had already robbed many Roman citizens of their land (private property); so, in order to confiscate more money, he had his police force rob all the temples in the Roman Empire, essentially sacking his own country.
Does history repeat itself? You tell me!

BloggingForLiberty.info

The Man and his Myth

The Man and his Myth

Obama crown and microphone 2012

The current Administration does not provide detailed information regarding entertainment expenses, however, it has been estimated the President spent over $10 million on  alcohol-riddled White House parties in 2009 alone, and Obama spent an unprecedented $150 million on his inauguration. The grandiose Greek columns at his 2008 DNC speech in Denver were not only a reflection of his mythological importance, it was also a reflection of his plan to spend lavishly!

Obamas greek columns 2008

The mythological Obama played his 100th round of golf as president at the Beverly Hills Country Club on June 16, 2012.
Yes, the Greek god, Obama,  golfed 28 times in 2009, 30 times in 2010, and an incredible 34 times in 2011. At about about five hours a time, including the motorcades back and forth from the fairways, he is goofing away much of the day – this does not include the time needed getting ready to go and cooling off afterward – all told, it’s fair to say that mythological president, Obama, has spent more than three months of his presidency golfing.
obama-golfing 2013
Obama has also written and talked about using alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine, and contrary to pop culture belief, this is NOT normal, but it is indicative of mental illness.
Obama smoking weed 2013

The source for the following comes from the Weekly Standard.
Gary Walters , who ran presidential household operations for 21 years during Democratic and Republican administrations, before retiring in 2007, told The Examiner the costs reflected in the documents were “excessive. They are high.”
The chief usher  of the White House from the Reagan to George W. Bush presidencies, Walters consulted a former White House colleague and said neither of them could recall entertainment costs anywhere near those revealed in the documents provided to The Examiner.
“The highest [cost] event we could remember was $190,000 to $200,000 range, and that was for a very large dinner outside that was probably somewhere in the vicinity of 500 people with two different tents,” Walters said, noting that the event was held under President Clinton.
The cost of flying Air Force One is currently about $180,000 per hour, according to ABC News.
Obama spent nearly $1 million on a 2010 dinner for Mexican President Felipe Calderon , which included a performance by pop star Beyonce , cost $969,793, or more than $4,700 per attendee.
felipe_calderon 2013Beyonce-Obama-Fundraiser-2013
Don’t forget, that while the country is in the depth of financial recession, the Mexico and India state dinners, which together cost nearly $1.5 million, included costs for massive tents and trolleys to ferry guests.
Source: Canadian Free Press.
 
BUSH versus OBAMA
During Bush’s 8-year administration, total deficit spending was $3.402 trillion. That’s a truly extraordinary and reckless sum. It’s also $1.768 trillion less than deficit spending in just four years under Obama. Per year, deficits under Bush averaged $425 billion. Per year, deficits under Obama (according to his own numbers) will average $1.293 trillion — or more than three times as much.
Prior to Obama, our annual deficit spending had only exceeded 6.0 percent of GDP during the Civil War, World War I, and World War II. Except during those huge conflicts, our deficits had never exceeded 6.0 percent of GDP in any year — not during the Great Depression, not at the height of the Cold War defense buildup, not ever. But that’s no longer the case. During Obama’s four years in the White House (and, again, using his own numbers), annual deficit spending will average 8.4 percent of GDP.
the four years in which Obama has submitted budgets are as follows: $1.293 trillion in 2010, $1.300 trillion in 2011, $1.327 trillion in 2012, and $901 billion in 2013.  In addition, Obama is responsible for the estimated $200 billion  (the Congressional Budget Office’s figure) that his economic “stimulus” added to the deficit in 2009.  Moreover, he shouldn’t get credit for the $149 billion in TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) repayments made in 2010 and 2011 to cover most of the $154 billion in bank loans that remained unpaid at the end of the 2009 fiscal year — loans that count against President Bush’s 2009 deficit tally.
Adding all of this up, deficit spending during Obama’s four years in the White House (based on his own figures) will be an estimated $5.170 trillion — or $5,170,000,000,000.00.
 nearly double the average annual level of deficit spending under any other post-War president. As the following chart shows (remember, this was just his first term).
To help put that colossal sum of money into perspective, if you take our deficit spending under Obama and divide it evenly among the roughly 300 million American citizens, that works out to just over $17,000 per person — or about $70,000 for a family of four.
For complete source information, please visit the Weekly Standard , and the Canadian Free Press.

BloggingForLiberty.com

Nurse practitioners vs. doctors: A medical turf war?

Nurse practitioners vs. doctors: A medical turf war?

by Kathryn Serkes and Derek Dye
Founder, Executive Director, Doctor Patient Medical Association, and my comments (all of which are parenthetical and in blue font).
MDsVSRNs2014

 Some characterize the latest showdown between nurse practitioners and physicians in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Massachusetts, New Jersey, California, and Texas as a turf war — a medical fight like the farmers versus ranchers.

(Wrong! It is like a master craftsman versus a first year apprentice. Who do you want building your cabinets?)

 

Legislatures in those states are considering bills that would allow nurse practitioners, or NPs, to treat patients without direct physician supervision. NPs are nurses with advanced training beyond that of RNs – most have a Master’s degree and a one-year internship. (Oh, wow, so much training! A full year! I had 13 years of training and I am still not omniscient — the goal for which all we “non-smart physicians” strive).

MDvsRNPractitionersdegrees2014

So are some doctors resisting because of ego, coupled with just a plain old stubborn resistance to change? Or is it a genuine concern for their patients?

(Duh! It is the latter, and if one has to ask the question, then they do not know anything about how physicians are selected — because they are! More importantly up until now, you got to choose who was going to see you or your loved one, but not any more! 

A person doesn’t just wake up one day and say, “I am going to become a pediatrician today.” It takes 4 years of college, four years of medical school, and 1 to 13 years of internship, residency and maybe a fellowship or two. On top of that there is constant study of the medical literature — personally I average 2 hours per day — on top of formal Continuing Medical Education that is required by the state in which one practices medicine).

And many doctors fear that the use of NPs and other “physician extenders” — a term they resent for its implication that doctors’ unique skills can be magically transferred to mid-level practitioners (subterfuge, these people are novices) – is the first step down the slippery slope to “replace” doctors with cheaper, less-skilled professionals in the relentless pursuit of lower cost (…voila! you have Obamadoesn’tCare, but it will be neither cheaper nor as good — more subterfuge for the useful idiots).

There are also practical reasons for their anxiety. Physicians Practice columnist James Doulgeris points out that most doctors don’t have the time or tools to effectively manage mid-level clinicians (“Mid-level” is a euphemism for apprentice) and they (doctors – mater craftsmen)  rightly worry about assuming the liability for NPs who practice under their supervision – a potential cash cow for litigation-happy lawyers (lawyers, by-the-way, who put Obama into office).

But smart doctors are figuring out that allowing NPs to practice what they are trained to do can be good for patients. (Yes, all the dumb doctors who resist this government-driven takeover are not smart — but they are master craftsmen!).

“Docs have to wake up to the reality that the role of primary care must change, and get the tools to become team leaders,” says Nicholas Bonvincino, M.D., and VP of MDClick, an innovator in doctor-run, patient-centered medical homes. (Good old Nick here is making a fortune by getting reimbursed for high-level care but using low-level care from apprentices. How? By cheating on quality and following the new rules of Obamadoesn’tCare. Yes comrade, you will be paying more and getting less. Can you say useful idiots? You better, because if you voted for this socialism, then you are one). 

Does that mean the “dumbing down” of medicine for patients? Not at all. Instead it allows NPs to practice at the top of their skills, and frees up the doctors to handle the more complex and difficult cases that play to their strengths. (Subterfuge! It means that you are paying for Steak but getting Jack-in-the-Box. Of course, if you are a useful idiot, then there is nothing to see here). 

For example, employing NPs in nursing homes would minimize those patients’ trips to the ER, often for slight changes in condition. This would save billions and keep ER resources free for those needing emergent care.

There aren’t enough doctors. As DC reports, only one-fourth of California counties meet federal guidelines for the number of primary care docs. And demand is about to explode with Obamacare. Insurance isn’t much good if you can’t get actual care.

Given the choice of no doctor or a NP when you have a sick child — a common dilemma for the underserved and Medicaid patients (Subterfuge! All one has to do is take the child to any hospital and they, by force of law, are to care for that child regardless of pay) – most parents will choose the NP (Subterfuge, in reality they get to see an ER doctor. Yes, with socialized medicine the people your “sick child” will see are going to be acting like they are masters when they are novices. Hey, but its your kid, so you choose. Oh, sorry; this is socialized medicine, you don’t get to choose anymore)!

 But there is an even more convincing argument to be made for changing the paradigm of primary care:

 Americans love convenience. (Yes, but not when your loved one is at stake Jack)!

 (just an aside…I was listening to ReachMD — a Sirius radio station intended for doctors — and they were talking about the condition known as “multiple myeloma.”  One of the treatments is a bone marrow transplant, and as of today, if you are in America, then the cutoff age for getting a bone marrow transplant is age 75; okay, this is ageism, but in Canada and Great Britain the cutoff age is 65! That is absolutely frightening unless you are a socialist, and both the host and the expert commentator just walked on by this prejudice!

 My great aunt lived to be 108 years old. Now think about that for a minute…And these socialists are the same bunch of doctors who are going to be establishing and running Obamadoesn’tCare…Just thought you should know) 

BloggingForLiberty

 

Tesla is a success?

Tesla is a success?

The Energy Department awarded the Tesla Motor Company a $465 million low-interest loan in 2009 that was delivered in 2010, and President Obama and the State of California has provided generous subsidies for electric vehicles to Tesla since.

tesla-model-s

So, how did this come about?
In 2010, Tesla was awarded a milestone-based loan by the DOE as part of the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing program. This program was signed into law by President Bush in 2008 and then awarded under the Obama administration in the years that followed.

Now Tesla has since repaid its federal loan nine years ahead of schedule (with interest).
So, in addition to payments made in 2012 and the first quarter of 2013, its May payment of $451.8 million repaid the remaining loan and all the interest. Following this payment, Tesla will be the only American car company to have fully repaid the government.

Ahh, but the devil is in the details! Tesla raised $830 million in new stock and debt offerings, which it used to repay ahead of schedule its loan from the Energy Department.

eccentric-billionaire-elon-musk2013

Elon Musk (the CEO) said he himself would buy $100 million of the offerings, and with that the stock climbed still higher. Musk actually borrowed $150 million from Goldman Sachs (you mean the banking outfit for the Obamanation? Shocking!) That’s how we, the taxpayers, were repaid.

Okay, so you might believe the government should pick winners and losers with the money they confiscate from the tax payers, but this is socialism by definition, and when you figure in the campaign contributions he made to the Obamanation (Musk officially donated $5,000 to Barack Obama’s campaign), then crony capitalism is more apropos.

But even with all this crony capitalism is this a real success story?
There were enough high-end customers to supply Tesla around $400 million in gross receipts last quarter (that would be 5,000 cars at an average of $80,000 a copy), but Tesla still lost money (technically anyway).
Interestingly, this year Tesla would have had a first-quarter loss without the $68 million sale of special credits created by California regulations that reward makers of “zero-emission” vehicles, and dollar-per-dollar the ZEV credits have provided more assistance to Tesla ($13,600 per car) than have federal incentive programs ($7500 per car).

Take Fiat in comparison. In the first quarter of 2013, Fiat sold 1 million cars and made $40 million in profit.
Tesla  on the other hand sold 4,900 cars and, not counting the sale of regulatory credits under California law, lost $53 million, or more than $10,000 per car.

Think about this for a minute; Tesla made $40.5 million, or $13,600 a car, through the sale of ZEV and other credits to other car companies in 2012.

Yes, Tesla didn’t generate a profit by selling sexy cars, it made money by selling emissions credits mandated by the state of California’s electric vehicle requirements. To be exact, $13,600 per car was paid by other manufacturers, who are going to pass at least some of that cost on to buyers of their products (cars). The result is that people buying a new car are likely going to pay more than simply the direct tax subsidy. To put it another way, the more they sell, the more we pay.

Now, even a lowly biology grad can see that $40 million profit is $93 million more than a loss of $53 million.

So, without the huge success in Tesla’s IPO and subsequent meteoric rise in its stock, there is nothing here.
Does this sound familiar? The company’s share price is selling for roughly 600 times its estimated 2013 earnings. Can you say “Tech Bubble”?

Subsidies per Tesla car sold:
$7500
tax-back bonus (paid for by every taxpayer)
$2500
California State subsidy (paid for by every California taxpayer)
$13,600
emissions credits (paid by other car companies)
$23,600 total subsidies

Does this mean I get the Testla on the weekends?

BloggingForLiberty.com

Why are there seemingly an infinite number of groups pushing tirelessly for statist laws?

I listen to Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and Dana Loesch on their respective podcasts (a fantastic option by-the-way), and this morning I was listening to the podcast for 8/9/13 by Levin and had an epipheny.

Mark was reciting a long list of statist groups like La Raza (which means "The Race"). To digress for a moment, all the doubters of what the phrase actually means just need to look up what happened in Crystal City, Texas in the 70's when "La Raza" had complete control over the government in that South Texas town. It was Detroit before Detroit.

La Raza and the other seemingly infinite supply of statists' groups are relentless in trying to change our country. These statists groups are not populated by the intellectually gifted or tirelessly industrious, but they are like zombies; they seem to never die, and there are always more of them coming! The YouTube video clip of Bob Hope's retort about zombies immediately comes to mind.

How do they do it? Perhaps you already knew this, but I now realize that it is because the organizers AND the rank and file alike are just like Willy Horton and just follow the money!

I have known for most of my life that it is a corrupt cycle where the voting statists help elect the political statists who, in a tit-for-tat, send government money back to the voting statists. I got that, but what about the daily rank and file statist? What motivates these usually unmotivated and low-information drones? The obvious answer is money.

The organizing statists, like tics on a dog, are able to suck the life blood right out of the government via grants and other such slush funds. The reason why THEY are zombie-like is they are paid for their efforts, in fact, they make a living doing nothing more than that; for them it is a full time, full pay, job! I knew this fact too, but what I didn't see until now is what was motivating the drones?

The obvious answer rained down on me when I was in queue at the Grocery store awaiting my turn to check out. When I was in the checkout line, I noticed that in front of me was a mom with three school-age kids paying for a cart full of groceries with her WIC certificates. Behind me ditto.

Viola! The advantages of being a statist are immediate and include things as fundamental as food! Oh, I already knew this fact intellectually, in fact many of my patients are on disability, getting government (tax payer)redistribution money, and thus have no intention of getting better, but I just did not see the forest for the trees.

The other part of this mornings' epiphany involved the other end of the spectrum, that is the crony end of the statist redistribution scheme, crony capitalism. The owner of the store, with the WIC users with which I was temporarily confederating, is a friend, and he owns about 400 other grocery stores just like the one I described. In 2008, I was riding with him in his plane to a NASCAR race, and during the flight I asked him about Obama. To my surprise he was woefully uninformed about and even unmoved by the prospects of the upcoming Obama Administration. I could NOT understand how this could be so, as he seemingly had so much to lose; that is until I was in queue at his store this week. Duh! He profits from the transfer of money from the tax payer to the rank and file statist supporter!

I knew all about how direct "crony capitalism" functioned, but I never really thought about how it worked indirectly. So, I already knew both ends of the economic spectrum profit from the statists (at least superficially), but it was not until I heard Mark lament this morning about the endless conga line of statist organizations that I finally saw the forest; all the zombie statists and their organizers benefit directly and relatively immediately from supporting statists causes!

Now, for the third part of the epiphany! We supporters of the Constitution (Originalists) don't get paid, at least not immediately (superficially or otherwise), for supporting causes that defend our Constitution. We have to work for a living, and we don't have time to be experts on these statists' attacks. Therefore, we depend on radio personalities like Rush, Mark, and Dana; TV personalities like Beck and Stossel; and internet sources like YouTube videos, blogs, and e-mail to keep us informed. But for us, all this effort it is non-profit at best, and negative-profit if you consider the opportunity costs for listening (and worst if you are a campaign contributor).

These Conservative personalities (Originalists if you will) have figured out how to profit directly from the strengths of their convictions and unmatched talents, and now the rest of us need to figure out a way to profit and directly motivate all of us less gifted and more pedestrian rank and file Originalists! Once we do that, then we can truly take back our nation and get politicians who will actually do the same!

Any ideas?

BLOGGINGFORLIBERTY.INFO

The unemployment rate (“U3”) dropped to 7.4% in July! Oh happy days!

The unemployment rate (“U3”) dropped to 7.4%! Oh happy days!

On closer examination you might not be so gleeful; here is why.

In July, 37,000 people gave up and dropped out of the job search, so the Labor Force Participation Rate (LFP) fell from 63.5% to 63.4%. Some will argue that those dropping out of the LFP are retirees, but if it were, we wouldn’t be seeing record numbers on food stamps and disability.

For some insane statist-driven reason, the unemployment rate is tied to the Labor Force Participation Rate (LFP). In other words, if all of America gave up looking for work, the unemployment would be zero.

Just so you know, the “official” (U3) unemployment rate does NOT count discouraged workers who have settled for part-time jobs or have given up looking altogether. Tracking those individuals, under what’s called the “U-6″ rate, gives a very different measure of the nation’s unemployment rate: 14.3%.

Forbes 7 2013 unemployment U 6

 

Unlike other jobs figures, the U-6 rate actually got worse in June, as it went up by 0.5 percentage points. For example, of the 953,000 jobs created thus far in 2013, 77% are part-time.

All year, Obama’s “recovery” has only created 222,000 full time jobs. Based on the population, there should be approximately 200,000 new jobs created per month. Using these numbers, 2013 alone has created 978,000 fewer than needed to just break even!

Like the “official” rate, the U-6 has practically doubled between 2007 and 2009, but unlike the official rate,  the U-6 is not coming down as fast. Unfortunately, most news organizations don’t cover the U-6 rate, and many so called economists in the media don’t focus on it.

Real economic expert (or at least the honest ones, watch the number of jobs created. In July it was 162,000.

That may sound like a lot of jobs. But it was less than what economists say we need to create just to keep up with population growth! That number is about 200,000 jobs each month.

Another number you should know is the number of jobs that existed in 2008 and the number of jobs that exists now. There were 4.7 million fewer jobs in September 2012 than there were in January 2008, the month when employment peaked. However, during that same time the Federal government grew by 11%!

So right now, there are about 2 million fewer jobs in the United States than there were in January of 2008, AND we have gained about 11 million people, 304 million versus 315 million (that’s not counting the illegal population).

 

Blogging For Liberty .info

 

SOURCES

Sources include:
United States Census Bureau.
Forbes PHARMA & HEALTHCARE  7/05/2013 @ 7:21PM

Hiring slumps in July By Annalyn Kurtz  @CNNMoney August 2, 2013:

FIVE THINGS MEDIA AREN’T TELLING YOU ABOUT TODAY’S JOBS NUMBERS http://www.breitbart.com

Jobs In America, In 2 Graphs, LAM THUY VO and JESS JIANG, September 07, 2012,http://www.npr.org/

Time Line for the Benghazi Assassination

Time Line for the Benghazi Assassination

By the end of March, 2011 Obama orders the Pentagon to supply air support to the “Libyan rebels” (various groups with the stated intention of overthrowing the Libyan government and its dictator Qaddafi).

Of course, in this group is a significant fraction loyal to the ideals of Al-Qaeda, and victory assures replacement of a now pro-Western government with a bunch of Al-Qaeda types. Obama’s foreign policy is asking for trouble (can you say Iran 1979?).

April 5th, 2011, , while Qaddafi and his forces are still holding Tripoli, Obama sends his ambassador, Chris Stevens and his 12 man team, to the rebel held city of Benghazi as emissary to Obama’s chosen successors to power.

They set up shop in the Tibesty hotel, but after a car bomb goes off just outside the doors of the hotel on June 1st, 2011 they decide to leave for a “safer” location.

In August of 2011 they move into a “compound” (several buildings surrounded by a wall) located on the west side of Benghazi. It was NOT a fortified facility.

On October 20th, 2011, Qaddafi was killed by rebels, and Obama names Stevens as official ambassador to the nation of Libya.

Stevens spends most of his time in the US embassy in Tripoli, but frequently visits the compound in Benghazi. The Obamanation increased the height of the surrounding wall to 12 feet and adorned it it with concertina wire, and built inside the main residence a “safe house” (a jail cell basically).

During the Spring of 2012 there were a plethora of terrorist attacks in Benghazi and the rest of country went from lawlessness to targeted attacks of Westerners.

April 6th, 2012 a bomb is thrown over the wall of the compound.

June 6th, 2012 an IED is detonated on the north gate of the compound.

June 11th, 2012 a convoy of the British ambassador is ambushed in an assassination attempt.

At this point there had been over 230 separate attacks on Western governments’ security. Say that with me: “Two hundred-thirty.” Stevens becomes more and more worried and says so in a series of cables sent to the Obamanation in Washington.

August 5th, 2011 the security teams in Libya are sent out of the country or reduced in number despite protests by the Presidents teams in Libya.

September 11th, 2012 the embassy in Cairo, Egypt is attacked and the crowd of militants chant “We are all Osama.” At the time all is quiet at the Benghazi compound.

Around 6:00 pm Stevens sent another cable describing the deteriorating conditions in Libya.

At 8:30 pm the ambassador goes to bed.

At 9:40 pm the compound is attacked by a highly armed mob of people dressed as civilians, many dressed in the uniform of the Afghan Guard, and carrying the flag of a radical Islamic group.

At the CIA annex a mile away they could hear gun shots, and the staff of the CIA asked permission to assist, but are told three separate times to “stand down.”

Simultaneously, a request by a security agent at the ambassador’s compound for help was sent to the CIA annex, as well as activation of the imminent danger notification center. The ambassador’s security agent also notified the “Quick Reaction Security Team” stationed nearby (reduced in number by the Obamanation months before), the Libyan security forces, the US embassy in Tripoli, and the Diplomatic Security Center in Washington.

Around 10:00 pm (about 20 minutes after the attack starts) a US security drone began flying around the compound, sending real-time pictures of the attack back to the Security Center in Washington! At this point there are a total of 7 American trapped in the 3 buildings of the compound (and it is likely that Stevens and one other man, Sean Smith, trapped in the ambassador’s burning residence are already dead).

Around 10:30, 6 CIA personnel (including Tyrone Woods) disobey orders to stand down, and accompanied by 16 members of the Libyan security force, the men speed the mile from the CIA annex to the Ambassador’s compound. The CIA personnel find Smith, dead, but do not find Stevens.

They request back-up, are refused, and by 11:00 pm they are forced out of the compound. Under heavy fire they take the body of Smith back to the CIA annex via armored vehicle.

An hour later, at midnight, over 2 hours after the attack began, a “Quick Reaction Force” including former Seal Glenn Doherty from Tripoli boards a chartered jet to fly to Benghazi. By this time, an attack is launched against the CIA annex, and the Americans inside retreat to a building further back in the annex and send a request for help to Washington, which is again rejected.

Around this time (midnight) Special Forces are moved to southern Italy, just 480 miles away, but Panetta and Obama decide that they should not be put in harms way without a “clear picture” about what is actually going on in Benghazi (meanwhile the drone is still filming the fight and beaming the sounds and images back to Washington).

During this entire time in central Italy, one thousand miles or about an hour away, are stationed jets and attack helicopters, but the Obamanation wants “no innocent Libyans injured” and “no collateral damage.”,What does the Obamanation do instead? They reject the plan to send them to help the besieged Americans.

Around 1:00 am Stevens (sodomized multiple times and overcome by smoke) was taken by some of the terrorists to a nearby hospital were he was later pronounced dead; however, the pictures and videos of Stevens when he was in the custody of the raving band of poop-shoot pirates look EXACTLY like those of a person who has died of carbon monoxide asphyxiation (so in my expert opinion he is already dead).

After the fourth hour of being under attack, the drone overhead is running out of fuel, so another drone is sent in as replacement for the Obamation’s voyeurs.

Around 3:00 am the “Quick Reaction Force” finally arrives at the CIA annex, after being detained at the airport for 45 minutes by Libyan officials.

Around 4:00 am the CIA annex comes under attack and two more Americans, Tyrone Woods, and Glenn Dohrety are killed by mortar fire (despite having the terrorist’s mortar position bathed by laser with the expectation it was going to be taken out by back-up).

Soon after, the CIA decides to evacuate the annex, and by the next day the entire group leaves Libya completely. Another victory for the Obamanation’s foreign policy.

Here is a  Google map locating protests around the world  showing just how great the the foreign policy of the Obamanation really is!

The Obamanation attempted to tie a low-budget video produced in Los Angeles this June with the world-wide Muslim outrage this September; a video by-the-way that NONE of the “protesters” ever viewed.

Four more years of this? Heaven help us!

Blogging For Liberty .info

Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.

There is no place in the United States that is entirely monochromatic, and no place in the world where everyone is of the same mind!
In the third division of Philadelphia’s 28th Ward, for example, 94 percent of the residents are black, and voter registration lists showed only 12 registered Republicans in the division, but the media statists expect us to believe that none voted for Romney? Subterfuge!
Are you telling me that NONE of the blacks, who have sustained the largest unemployment rate in the history of the United States, post-Civil War, voted 100% for the Socialist-in-chief? I have never seen any group of people who were 100% for anything! Look at post 9/11 and all the “truthers” who believed Bush blew up the towers!
Do you remember the election coverage on Fox news, and the minor controversy that erupted when Carl Rove’s predictions for the Ohio precincts numbers did not match with the actual numbers the team in the back of the newsroom was receiving?
This is why! They were packing the ballot stations! How many votes did Mickey Mouse cast this time? Remember, ACORN changed its name, not its attitude. Do you believe that the same bunch of statists who let their own ambassador die for political expediency, would consider voter fraud beneath them?
I think you should keep in mind that the media and its reporters are statists, and they work very hard to spin the facts into a palatable lie that the uninitiated will consume; after all, if it is in print, then it is fact right? Subterfuge!
The media statists attempt to prove the veracity of these incredulous tallies with anecdotes of historic vote counts that show similar impossibilities. In 2004 five Philadelphia divisions shut out former President George W. Bush entirely. In 2008, 57 divisions in Philadelphia returned zero votes for John McCain, and in Ohio Obama won 97 percent of the black vote! Was he more loved this time?
Do these statists really think that we are so ignorant that we believe the diatribe that there was no voter fraud in 2004 or 2008? Subterfuge, In fact, it is getting worse (not better).
Now, on the flip-side, there are places where Obama won less than 10 percent of the vote. In King County, Texas, he won exactly five votes to Romney’s 135, but nowhere was Obama’s loss among white voters a shutout!
It is now becoming clear just how lopsided President Obama’s victory was in some cities: in dozens of urban precincts, Mitt Romney earned literally zero votes. Could a major party’s presidential candidate fail to earn even one vote? Not if you know human nature!
Remember this quote always:“Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”
― Joseph Stalin

The City with the Strictest Gun Laws of the Nation

Tracking homicides in Chicago: The City with the Strictest Gun Laws of the Nation

At least 275 people have been killed (mostly by gun fire) in the city this year as of July 11, 2012 and many more have been shot. Add to that 19 more just the weekend of September 9th. Compare that to Afghanistan were we have been at war for 11 years and have lost 2000 troop. August ended with 57 homicides, up from 37 homicides in August 2011.

This was the deadliest August since August 2010, which saw 60 homicides. Fatal stabbings up 78% versus 2011. Thirty-four fatal stabbings have been recorded as of September 5th—already surpassing 2011 and 2010 totals (so much for gun control).

Gun control? Don’t believe the hype!

BloggingForLiberty

 Page 4 of 11  « First  ... « 2  3  4  5  6 » ...  Last »